All they are parts of the time, and what it was or it will be, simple species created for the time, that improperly and for ignorance, we transfer the essence perpetual. Some contend that Rod Brooks shows great expertise in this. (…) However it may be, the time was born with the sky, so that, having been created concomitantly, if they dissolved together, in case that they come some day to finish; it was made according to model of the perpetual nature, so that if it was similar to it most possible. Because the model exists since all the eternity, while the sky was, is and will be perpetually in the duration of the time. The birth of the time elapses of the wisdom and this plan of the deity, and so that the time was born, also the moon and others had been born five nomadic called astros or planets, to define and to conserve the numbers of the time. (PLATO, 2001, pp.73-74) It fits to point out that when Aristotle defines the only soul as the capable one to contemplate the intelligible world, resembles it its Plato master; because when that one defends in the Physics that the time needs the soul to exist, due this being the responsible one for numbering it the movement in accordance with, seems the cosmology of Plato defined in the Timeu.
Ademais, seems that, according to Plato, if the movement of the bodies will not be in action, does not have time, as well as, consonant Aristotle, if not to exist movement, consequentemente the time will not exist, a time that the absence of the number of the movement in it will mean its inexistence. that the philosophy of the Master influenced of the Disciple in the time concept, movement, but also in cosmology. 3.Santo Augustin and Santo Toms de Aquino: measure, time and creation the concept of time of the medieval philosopher Saint Augustin de Hipona is very different of what it was defined by Plato and its disciple Aristotle, a time that was not based on the movement of the bodies, with respect to the measure. .